mmmmmmmm.......*drools* yummy he is so delicious lookin... - WOLFYGRL, MOUNTAIN CITY, TN    She looks horrible. She doesn't know how to carry h... - CORY, MIAMI, FL USA    10 years is a huge age difference... - CHARITY, LA,CALIFORNIA     I think he is a good actor and he always cast into his... - WANOD, THAILNAD    Cute phot... legendary now. two best artist! =)... - TIFFANY, DONETSK, UKRAINE    rob pat is soooooooooooo ugly! [alyor is so much beter ... - IN UR FACE, FORKS    “We need to figure out how to play it all down be... - YO, NO    I totally agree. I have read the books and do apprecia... - EVA, PORTLAND, OR, USA    until you feel the pain and loss of a child dont judge ... - , AUSTRALIA    i think it is great that i'm a celebrity has starte... - REBECCA, HULL    
My EW Login Register My Comments Community
RSS Feeds

Katie Holmes' Ex: 'She Was Pregnant When We Split'

According to U.S. tabloid...

Friday 25th Jan 2008

A U.S. tabloid is quoting a source who claims that Katie Holmes may have been pregnant when she split from ex-boyfriend Chris Klein – BEFORE she embarked on a relationship with husband Tom Cruise.

Katie and Chris split in March 2005 after five years together.

A month after the breakup, the actress flew to Los Angeles from New York to meet Tom.

After a whirlwind (and very public) romance, Tom revealed in June that Katie had accepted his marriage proposal and in October the same year the couple announced that Katie was expecting.

The Inquirer’s source claims to have met with Chris – whose film career took a dive following his role in the hit American Pie movies – before the engagement was made public.

Says the ‘pal’: “We were having dinner at Cafeteria, a restaurant in NY’s Chelsea district, when Chris blurted out ‘Dude, you know I got Katie preggers.’

“There was a long silence. I realized Chris had said more than he intended. My next thought was: What happened to the baby?”

Chris apparently didn't reply.

“From the look in Chris’ eyes, I realized this was highly personal. I didn’t want to probe any further. We quickly went on to another topic,” the source continues.

“Chris never brought it up again, but I know he must be reminded of Katie’s pregnancy every time he sees her daughter Suri.”

The fact that Suri’s birth certificate wasn’t signed until 20 days after her birth date (April 18, 2006) and then it was a full five months before anyone glimpsed the tot in public, prompted speculation that Katie’s daughter may have been born earlier than claimed.

None of which detracts from the fact that little Suri is the spitting image of Tom.


By: Cher Tippetts

Photo: WENN

Reader Comments

(3)
  • I thought I read where Katie was a virgin when she met Tom. I heard it on TV too.

    by Cassie, Miami FL US

     1 year, 10 months ago

    [reply]

  • DNA tests exist for a reason. If he thinks Suri is his why hasnt he had one done any1 can c Suri is Toms

    by xElfYx | Send Message Send Message View Profile View User's Comments

     1 year, 10 months ago

    [reply]

  • It is such a pity that as soon as one "conspiracy" about Suri is solved, another starts. Even if DNA proves she is Tom's there would be suggestions of "paid" cover - ups. With these vicious critics, the Cruise family cannot win. They see nothing wrong with even attacking a child. How terrible for her later, to read these vicious rumours. If Kate was pregnant by March, she would have conceived in Jan and Suri would have been born in Sept. I recall photos of TomKat even i

    by Jeanette, Brisbane Australia

     1 year, 10 months ago

    [reply]

Add Comment

Register now to have your comments approved automatically!



 characters left. [+]

   






Latest Photos

MORE GALLERIES »

Check out Urban News on TaleTela.com

Check out Festival Guide 2009 on Gigwise.com

© 2005-2009 Giant Digital | Terms and Conditions | Privacy | RSS Feeds | Advertising | Job Vacancies | Contact Us